Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Soap Operas
WikiProject
Project navigation links
Main project page talk
Tasks
Participants
Templates
Assessment
 → Unassessed articles
 → Statistics
Useful links
Style guidelines
edit · changes

FAR for Pauline Fowler

[edit]

I have nominated Pauline Fowler for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Episode numbers

[edit]

For the past few months, various IPs have continuously been adding unsourced episode numbers to infoboxes despite being asked not to, warned and even blocked. The problem with this is that the episode numbers are unsourced; with most TV programmes they have seasons and a less amount of episodes and thus it is easier to keep track off, but soap operas have thousands of episodes (with Emmerdale and Coronation Street having 10,000+, and some American soaps having even more). Many of the episode numbers in the past have been changed as they have proven to be wrong. Obviously some are easier to source than others (AKA Emmerdale's recent 10000th episode) but most are extremely difficult to source. I hence wanted to ask for a consensus on how to move forward with this. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue I have is the original research aspect of episode numbers. They are being added by various IPs, sock accounts and grouped edits that appear to have been arranged off Wikipedia. When asked where the information came from, one IP stated it was from Fandom which certainly is not a reliable source. Some episodes are grouped together, broadcast on the same day etc. I would not argue with them being added, if in the development section the information is sourced. The source would need to clearly state the episode number and the first appearance date. These random additions seem harmless but how many errors are we potentially allowing to be introduced? It is easier to just not include the information.Rain the 1 11:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Stephanie Scully#Requested move 3 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Poppy Meadow

[edit]

I have nominated Poppy Meadow for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 12:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pablo Escobar, The Drug Lord#Requested move 1 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Alpha3031 (tc) 01:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Names in article leads

[edit]

Bringing back this discussion about the use of names other than the common-name in the lead of the article. Some suggest the present martial name be used over common-name. Yes, other names exist in-fictional universes but, at what point, does it cross from fan cruft of a Fandom article and of something more useful and supported, via reliable sources. WP:NAMECHANGES could also apply, as that states: Sometimes the subject of an article will undergo a change of name. When this occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable, English-language sources ("reliable sources" for short) written after the name change. If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. and while we wouldn't necessarily change the article, a notation of said-name would be made outside of the {{Infobox soap character}} mention in the| alias = parameter. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've always listed four previous discussions, including one that was held of MOS:TV in 2014 (ie: Married names in the lead of fictional character articles). livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]