Talk:Patriarchy

Balance

Thread retitled from "Unbalanced article".

It's easily evident when comparing it to the matriarchy article, the patriarchy article is written in a negative way, automatically adjudicating it terms such as dominate, exploitation, oppression, etc while the matriarchy article is more neutral (Which is the right way to make an article), clearly demonstrating a political bias in this article. I'm not stating that these two social systems are good or bad, I'm only pointing out the obvious bias, which conflicts with the logic of the definitions: Matriarchy is patriarchy but with the positions swapped, nothing else, and the results of these systems doesn't influence what they are by themselves, at any case, this should be in a category about the impacts on society or criticism.

This is not a neutral point of view, and should be improved, so I left the unbalanced template (I didn't improve the article because I'm not very experienced, so I leave the task to anyone interested) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.18.149.130 (talk) 07:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

"Neutral point of view" on Wikipedia means adhering to the predominant views expressed in reliable sources. If you disagree with the sources cited in the article, then feel free to present your own. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't have enough time or interest to search more neutral sources, so I'll leave the unbalanced template so anyone interested can correct it.

Stop reverting the edit or you'll end up exposing yourself as very biased like the writers of this article. 186.18.149.130 (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

See WP:CLEANUPTAG: "Cleanup tags are meant to be temporary notices that lead to an effort to fix the problem, not a permanent badge of shame to show that you disagree with an article, or a method of warning readers about an article." Since you are apparently uninterested in trying to fix the perceived problem, there's no justification for tagging the article. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Agreed. This very first sentence using "dominance" instead of supremacy as in Webster, and "privilege" when that word isn't used in any source, shows how absurdly bias this wiki page leans. 2600:8803:77E0:E800:5B0:FDE9:6BCE:4EF3 (talk) 03:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

how would supremacy be better than dominance? I can also instantly show you multiple sources that use both of these words. If you can not bring any sources why bother? 2A02:908:13B5:9C60:C5DD:A1C3:FC14:1E2C (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

@186.18.149.130 I agree. I looked at the preview for matriarchy, and I saw multiple photos of women protesting or posters supporting matriarchy, but when I saw the preview for patriarchy, the only photo I saw was a graffiti that said "FIGHT PATRIARCHY". Wikipedia editors have a very bad habit of supporting left leaning articles and diminishing the right leaning articles. I'm not suggesting that wikipedia should be a right wing encyclopaedia, but rather that they don't show bias when writing controversial articles such as this. KnoSpaces (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Definition in introduction

Thread retitled from "Poor introduction".

I have an issue with the definition in the introduction, "Patriarchy is a social system in which men dominate over others" since men clearly occupy both dominating and dominated positions in most societies, (leaders vs. criminals and homeless etc.). I like the phrasing in the etymology much better"...refer to social systems in which power is primarily held by adult men" I would suggest this definition: "Patriarchy is a social system in which positions of dominance and privilege are primarily held by men." The current version I find absolutist and generalizing to the point of meaninglessness. Thorseth (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree. Can you provide sources to back up your preferred version as more representative of what "patriarchy" means? Of the universe (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I think a technical definition (closer to a dictionary) would be good for the beginning, and then it could be expanded further down, with something like "... in most feminist theories patriarchy is used as derogatory term, encompassing only negative aspects ..." and here we could use the primary source references that are currently at the top.

Merriam-Webster.com

social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line broadly: control by men of a disproportionately large share of power

Encyclopedia Britannica

patriarchy, hypothetical social system in which the father or a male elder has absolute authority over the family group; by extension, one or more men (as in a council) exert absolute authority over the community as a whole.

Oxford reference

patriarchy, hypothetical social system in which the father or a male elder has absolute authority over the family group; by extension, one or more men (as in a council) exert absolute authority over the community as a whole.

Cambridge Dictionary

a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society controlled by men in which they use their power to their own advantage

Collins dictionary

a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society controlled by men in which they use their power to their own advantage:

PS I realize its a difficult subject because it seems to be a term primary used by people with a somewhat specific agenda. Thorseth (talk) 10:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Having given it a bit more thought, maybe the best way to find an appropriate definition would be to look at reputable anthropology/sociology/feminist dictionaries, since those are the relevant fields of study. (but I don't currently have time for that)

In the meantime, the sources you've provided seem sufficient to outweigh the primary sources in the article, so imo go ahead and adjust the definition. Of the universe (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Also Britannica: The consensus among modern anthropologists and sociologists is that while power is often preferentially bestowed on one sex or the other, patriarchy is not the cultural universal it was once thought to be. However, some scholars continue to use the term in the general sense for descriptive, analytical, and pedagogical purposes. The contemrorary feminist theory probably says about (cis)heteropatriarchy in the Western society, not about the 'clear' patriarchy. Also, the sources who say man meaning cisgender heterosexual gender-conforming man aren't good enough. There are lots of sources about oppression of trans men, of gay men, of gender-nonconforming men, of Black men (Black Male Studies) in the patriarchal system and because of the patriarchal system. The article shouldn't look the way "The contemprorary society is patriarchal. In the patriarchal society men oppress women. dot".--Reprarina (talk) 07:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Great Russian Encyclopedia: Patriarchy was characteristic of many archaic societies of antiquity and the Middle Ages; it existed as a relic in modern times; preserved among a number of modern peoples. Like Britannica, the Great Russian Encyclopedia does not view patriarchy as a cultural universal. Reprarina (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Why doesn't anyone quote them? The "anthropological" vision of patriarchy is largely absent in the introduction of the article, despite mentioning it (and it has important differences with sociological or feminist theory). ComradeHektor (talk) 06:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

For example, in Anthropology it is precisely not considered to be something universal, and a somewhat more restricted definition is given to the concept. ComradeHektor (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Probably because the Great Russian Encyclopedia is a project of the Russian government under Vladimir Putin, which is known to spread misinformation about gender-related issues. Not what I would call a reliable source. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but I was referring to the others as well (Britannica, Merriam, Oxford...). I think they are what we would call "reliable", right? More than anything because they all agree on the same thing. ComradeHektor (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Definition of patriarchy

It has been claimed that patriarchy gives more equality to men than women by an extreme margin, but it is quite incorrect as it actually gives more power to rich men than to anyone else. Not all men are rich so this is quite incorrect Quintus rex (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

It has been claimed – where? Not in this article. As per the first paragraph, The term patriarchy is used ... in feminist theory to describe a broader social structure in which men as a group dominate women and children. Even though some men are comparatively disempowered, men as a group still dominate women and children in most societies. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

The section on pre-history

The section on pre-history seems to conflate 'patriarchal structures' with 'a sexual division of labour'. It cites the Betuel article from Inverse as a story of how patriarchy developed, whereas what it actually describes is the development of a stable monogamous family and of some kind of division of labour between men and women. There is absolutely no mention of 'domination of women by men', which is what patriarchy is normally understood to mean. Wrangham's theory is, again, about the division of labour between men and women connected to the emergence cooking, but nothing in the retelling seems to concern patriarchy, i.e. domination. And finally, the Alger et al article also proposes one way of development that could have led to the same things - 'paternal investment', i.e. a stable monogamous family and of some kind of division of labour. None of the three sources describes the emergence of patriarchy, all three describe the emergence of paternal investment. Using them as a source for the primeval nature of patriarchy is grossly misleading. Whoever added them apparently couldn't imagine a family or fatherhood without patriarchy and so treated them as synonymous in their reading of the sources. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I can not find where you found this reading. Maybe this was changed already? But the article only states: "Some preconditions for the eventual development of patriarchy were the emergence of increased paternal investment in the offspring, also referred to as fatherhood, and of a sexual division of labour. " Which I think is fine, no? Tornbetween (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Definition in feminist theory

This subject is so central to feminist scholarship, and feminist scholarship so dominates high-quality coverage of this subject, that a mention of it is definitely due for the first paragraph. We say in the lead that "The term patriarchy is used ... in feminist theory to describe a broader social structure in which men as a group have dominance in society and Nicole.Schinder has proposed removing the part after the ellipsis. I don't think the reasons given for removal are compatible with MOS:LEAD's instructions about the purpose of a lead, which is to summarize the body. Reasons given so far are:

1. "For the quality of the article it´s better to do not add conclusion and opinions from a single theorist group in the beginning of the article. There is already a session in the article reserved for the theories."
2. "There is already a entire session in the article. It's not good for the article to give highlight with special space in the beginning for only one group of theorists."

If we buy into those reasons, much of the lead would need to be removed, since we spend most of it reviewing how theorists in different fields approach the topic. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. The objections here make no sense; there's nothing opinionated about saying a term is used (by feminists or anyone else) to mean XYZ. Without the definition from feminist theorists, the rest of the material in the lead about inequality, gender roles, and legal, political, religious, and economic organization would make no sense. when we say sociologists tend to reject predominantly biological explanations of patriarchy we're not talking about the male head of a family or clan. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

However, we are talking about a term that is not only used in sociology. ComradeHektor (talk) 20:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

No, we are talking about a social system according to the introductory sentence. Wikipedia articles discuss topics, not just terms, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

But we are then talking about two different systems –by the way, correcting editions without reading the referenced sources is bad manners–, one is, under a concise definition: "primitive social organization in which authority is exercised by a male head of each family, this power extending to even distant relatives of the same lineage", linked above all to the family structure of Greece and Rome (with a shared system). The other is a system of exploitation of men towards women in Marxist terminology. They clearly refer to different things, and dictionaries like Encyclopedia Britannica or Oxford one clearly tend towards this first definition (you can see it in the quotes used by user @Of the universe above), these two meanings should not be confused in such a relevant article. ComradeHektor (talk) 21:35, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I feel like it should at least be made clear when it is in one sense of the word or another. ComradeHektor (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I agree with the change. My bad. Nicole.Schinder (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks NS! A willingness to say "my bad" will take you far here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: ENG 21011 Research Writing

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2024 and 8 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rmoner1, LaneyL (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jbarbati7, Bella Vargo, Avargo22, Gdugan05, Jgrandfi, Sam.Cowger1.

— Assignment last updated by Wordnerd104 (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Irrelevant info

@Sangdeboeuf The content about Sima Bahouse's statements focuses on poverty alleviation, economic policies, more relevant to discussions on economic inequality and development. It does not directly address the structural dynamics of patriarchy, within that framework, which is the central focus of the article. It is immaterial and out-of-scope for this article. 182.183.54.110 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)